Twin sophomores launch free AI-use test for students

Fletcher and Maxwell Dubin, twin economics majors at UC Davis and UC Santa Cruz, launched Your AI IQ on November 10 to measure how students actually work with AI instead of whether they are cheating. The free, anonymous three-minute test scores nine dimensions of AI use, publishes its full methodology and is designed to help professors, students and researchers see how AI is changing schoolwork.

Why it matters: - Your AI IQ aims to replace a cheating-versus-honesty debate with a clearer picture of how students use AI in real work. - The launch comes as student self-reporting and peer perception diverge. A Dartmouth survey announced October 30 found 23% of U.S. college students said they use AI to draft essays, while they believed 55% of peers do. - The project is built to show whether students are navigating AI use, not to judge whether anyone broke a rule.

What happened: - Fletcher Dubin and Maxwell Dubin launched Your AI IQ, a free three-minute test, on November 10. - The twins are sophomores and economics majors at UC Davis and UC Santa Cruz. - The test asks how people relate to AI and does not ask whether anyone cheated. - Fletcher Dubin said, "If this helps one professor see that her students aren't cheating, they're navigating — that's the whole point."

The details: - The test uses 41 swipe cards and requires no name, email or login. - It scores nine dimensions, including who starts the work, whether the output gets checked, whether the person is there to learn or just finish, and how far AI has shaped the person's thinking. - The test returns one of 40 archetypes, including The Architect, The Ghost and The Strategist. - Each result includes a score from 0 to 100, strengths, blind spots, a shadow risk and one growth edge. - The score is an index of how much thinking stays with the person, how well they verify AI output and how fluently they work with the model. - Maxwell Dubin said, "I don't think most people our age are just pasting and submitting. A lot of us are figuring out where the line is — what we still want to do ourselves and what we don't. The test is just trying to make that visible." - Every swipe is timed, including questions about trusting AI and checking output. - Response time is not used in the score. - The brothers have not drawn conclusions from the timing data yet and say they have stated in advance how they plan to analyze it. - Maxwell Dubin said, "The hesitation thing is what I keep thinking about. People will tell you they check everything. How long it takes them to swipe is harder to clean up. We don't know what it's going to show. That's why we're collecting it." - The methodology page at the full methodology lists every card weight, the order of the decision rules, the score formula and more than 30 cited papers. - The methodology also includes an "Open issues, as of launch" section that flags known imperfections. - The research data is anonymous by design. - The site assigns a random ID generated in the browser and stores no name, email or IP address. - Findings will be published first on the project site, in aggregate only. - No individual result will ever be published. - Group links already work for classes, clubs and teams. - A 144-question version is in development to narrow the margin of error and add peer percentiles. - A press kit with a backgrounder, fact sheet, quotes and images is available at the press kit.

Between the lines: - The Dubins are trying to make student-AI behavior measurable in a way that is more nuanced than a simple academic-integrity question. - Publishing the scoring rules and known limitations is a signal that the project is meant as an open research instrument, not just a personality quiz. - Timing data could become the most interesting part of the project because it captures hesitation, but the brothers have not said what it will prove.

What's next: - The project will publish findings in aggregate on Your AI IQ. - The developers plan to expand the experience with a longer 144-question version and peer percentile comparisons. - Fletcher and Maxwell Dubin said they are available for interviews, together or separately, and reporters can take the test or request a group tag for a newsroom.

The bottom line: - The Dubin twins are betting that colleges need a better way to understand AI use than asking whether students are cheating.